Friday, August 8, 2025

AF2 Gallery: "The Seagull's Alphabet" & Other Recent Eco-Asemics & Object Poems by Geof Huth (New York City)

 


"The Seagull's Alphabet" by Geof Huth (New York City) (August 2025)
 (Image courtesy of the poet)



"The Seagull's Alphabet" & Other Recent Eco-Asemics 
& Object Poems by Geof Huth


by De Villo Sloan


These days writing about esoteric abstractions such as metasmics and patasemics makes it easy for me to forget my first serious asemic theory to receive attention in our broader community was my writing about eco-asemics:


When Peter Schwenger was doing the research for his book Asemic: The Art of Writing (2019), he contacted me about some of my blog posts where Nancy Bell Scott (Maine, USA) and I had traded tree bark as mail art and called it asemic. Both she and I had been involved in some extensive online discussions about identifying asemic symbols in nature as well as in found material generated by humans. 


I deeply appreciate that Peter Schwenger found Nancy and I interesting and - in turn - that we could help him frame his thinking for what has become a classic book. When Nancy and I were trading Birch bark, I know we weren't thinking too seriously about conceptual art or the roots of language: (But the asemic seed was planted.) We were, honestly, having some fun and enjoying the creative freedom mail art allows. Nancy Bell Scott is a singular talent who significantly contributed to the growth of the asemic movement. 

Thus, I always try to represent eco-asemic visual poets on the blog. I have tremendous admiration for the poets who find their true visions in nature. Veteran visual poet Geof Huth is - as far as I'm concerned along with many other AF2 readers - doing spectacular work with eco-asemics, object poetry and the exciting synthesis taking place between the two.


- De Villo Sloan
Elbridge, New York, USA
August 8, 2025




"Shull 451: and may change and alter the same" by Geof Huth 
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)





"The See-E" by Geof Huth (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the poet)






"Woud 49: AT a/ti" by Geof Huth (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the poet)





"Untitled" by Geof Huth (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the poet)





"Shull 456: fhall be velted in" by Geof Huth (August 2025)  
(Image courtesy of the poet)





"perfon, who fhall throw any carcafe" by Geof Huth  
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)




De Villo Sloan is a concrete poet living in Upstate, New York. He writes frequently about postavant art & culture. He is director of the Winifred & De Villo Sloan, Jr., Charitable Fund.







Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Machine L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E: Danny Snelson "Reconstitutes" Charles Bernstein's Classic Avant Texts

 


Cover of Danny Snelson's project to "reconstitute" Charles Bernstein's 
L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E (May 2023/25)


Danny Snelson is involved in a project, L≠A≠N≠G≠U≠A≠G≠E, using artificial intelligence to "reconstitute" the original magazine published by the Language poets (1978-82) "so that machines might appreciate this 'poetics'". Visit the project here:

https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/the-little-database/resource/snelson-9781452973456-r006

Deepest thanks to Christian Bok who originally shared this information at X.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Dispatches from the Metasemic Hyperreal: New Work by EgiDia Elle (Italy), Miekal And (USA), Mike Miskowski (USA), Kristen Szumyn (Australia)

 


"Mirage from the past" by EgiDia Elle (Turin, Italy) 
(August 2025) (Image courtesy of the artist)



(Make sure to click to enlarge)




From PANSEMIC TEXTSTORM (with translation) by Miekal And 
(Wisconsin, USA) (July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)



Square 1


Violet storms wail electric dirge across fields
Shattered echoes drift beneath silent moon’s gaze
Fractured hearts pulse incandescent through ashen air
Ghost-winds murmur lost lullabies on the wind
Time’s shards float down ruins of ancient spires
Night’s ember-rain kindles whispers of tomorrow
Dawn carves its cry across a weary sky

Square 2

Deep oceans tremble under impossible ice
Salt-veins shiver where no sunlight ever falls
Submerged runes uncoil in drowned cathedral halls
Currents carry songs of drowned constellations
Coral-veils sway to a phantom’s lullaby
Breathless pearls drift toward the crushing dark
Pressure blooms crystal roses in the deep

Square 3

Scarlet rivers flow backward through ragged bones
Blood-tide blossoms in the marrow of time
Veins of flame map a geography of grief
Heart-cinders flicker on the brink of void
Each pulse erupts with the roar of stars
Ash and ember intertwine in silent dance
All endings blossom into new beginnings

Square 4

Wind-carved mountains hum with ancient memory
Stone-voices echo in the hollow of days
Broken peaks cradle vaults of buried stars
Sun-dust settles on the crest of legends
Roots of granite twist toward hidden worth
Sky-fissures bleed light into timeless dark
Pilgrims of dust kneel before stone-gods

Square 5

Neon flowers bloom on metal-waste horizons
Circuit-vines pulse with the hum of ghosts
Synthetic petals slow-dance in acid rain
Iron-breezes carry the scent of ozone
Rust-spores drift among electric gardens
Digital moths flicker in the cobalt night
Memory-seeds sprout in coded cathedrals

Square 6

Clock-ciphers spin within the mind’s deep vault
Ticking shadows stretch across thought’s expanse
Pendulums chant in the language of hours
Seconds fracture into galaxies of cost
Silent gears grind out stories of regret
Time-ghosts wander halls of vanished chance
Tomorrow stands at the threshold of now

Square 7


Ember-wings glimmer atop collapsed spires
Phoenix-ashes drift through the ashen air
Renewal’s heartbeat stirs beneath cold dust
Flame-seeds sleep in the cavern of stone
Hope’s spark waits in the hollow of night
Dawn’s breath coaxes new life from ruin
Every death carries the seed of dawn

Square 8


Celestial gardens bloom on cratered plains
Starlight-dew drips from the bones of comets
Moon-vines curl around forgotten temples
Meteor-petals scatter over endless night
Galactic winds hum hymns of creation
Universe-roots delve through the womb of dark
Life awakens in the hush between stars

- Miekal And (July 2025)





From PANSEMIC TEXTSTORM by Miekal And (Wisconsin, USA )
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)





"Disguised agenda" by Mike Miskowski (Arizona, USA )
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)





"Notation - databending" 
by Kristen Szumyn 
(Australia)
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the poet)







Friday, August 1, 2025

Vispo by Thomas Cassidy Including Collabs with Sheila E. Murphy & John M. Bennett (USA)


Vispo collab by Thomas Cassidy (Minnesota, USA) 
& Sheila E. Murphy (Arizona, USA) (2013)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)





"Practice" by Thomas Cassidy (July 2025)
(Image courtesy of the artist)




Vispo collab foundation by Sheila E. Murphy (circa 2010)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)





"Bunda" by Thomas Cassidy & John M. Bennett (July 2025)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)




Vispo collab foundation by Sheila E. Murphy (circa 2010)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)





"heat mirage" by Thomas Cassidy & John M. Bennett (June 2025)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)





Vispo collab foundation by Sheila E. Murphy (circa 2010)
(Image courtesy of Thomas Cassidy)







Sunday, July 27, 2025

Asemic Front 2 Gallery: "Man from Cyclades" & Other New Asemic Writing by Tatiana Roumelioti (Athens, Greece)


"Man from Cyclades" by Tatiana Roumelioti (Athens, Greece) 
(July 2025) (Image courtesy of the artist)





"About Constellations" by Tatiana Roumelioti (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the artist)





"Within a Star" by Tatiana Roumelioti (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the artist)





"Under the Moonlight" by Tatiana Roumelioti (July 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the artist)





"Never Alone" by Tatiana Roumelioti (June 2025) 
(Image courtesy of the artist)








Thursday, July 24, 2025

Asemic Front 2 Commentary: A Response to Federico Federici's "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" by De Villo Sloan

Visual poetry by Federico Federici (Italy) (2018) 
(Image courtesy of the Asemic Front Archive)



A Response to Federico Federici's "Misreading Asemic Writing
 as Kitsch: Scientific Forms and Structural Depth" 



by De Villo Sloan


Followers of the Asemic Front Project know of my admiration for the visual poetry and poetic theory of Federico Federici. He has published an essay at his Weisses Werk website that I believe is of particular relevance to themes consistently appearing here at Asemic Front 2: “Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch: Scientific Forms and Structural Depth.” By all means hasten to the primary source:

Frederico Federici is a postmodern Renaissance person. He earned a degree in physics from the University of Genoa (Italy) and is a practicing scientist. He is also a prolific and acclaimed visual poet who publishes and performs worldwide. Federici offers us valuable insights of importance to the community. Here are some of my thoughts about the article: 

1) “Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch” primarily discusses the presence (or lack thereof) of structures in asemic writing/composition. I am a believer in asemic forms, especially as they are proposed by Federici. The late, brilliant Belgian poet Guido Vermeulen argued with me publicly saying, 'Form in asemic texts is theoretically impossible.' I wish my dear friend Guido were here to read Federici’s essay and consider its subtle nuances. Federici untangles the threads. 

This passage from "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" explains the primary binary opposition in his main premise (although Federici transcends the binary in his discourse): 

"Science, sharpened by methodological uncertainty, resists any closure: its pursuit of simplicity is not an aesthetic concession but the hard-won outcome of falsification and reduction. Kitsch, by contrast, operates through immediacy, relying on recognizable signs emptied of critical function and shaped by cultural clichés or personal resonance. It is thus evident that the symbolic thought underlying scientific notation differs radically from, and is irreconcilable with, any aesthetic-emotional perspective.

"Labelling asemic-scientific works as kitsch assumes that their scientific forms are deployed merely for their technical appeal. Yet, absent rigorous evidence, one could argue that the hybridization of asemic writing and scientific language operates on a cutting-edge plane, shaped by natively void signifiers and formal systems rather than semantic content. Hence, the asemanticisation process does not apply to the signifiers themselves but reveals the structures that bind and articulate them. This approach parallels symbolic computation, where signifiers function relationally without intrinsic content." (Federico Federici Weisses Werk)

2) My own forays into using scientific and mathematical signification systems in my own work are largely intuitive and often use found material. But my instincts – as Federici’s reasoning affirms – tell me these modes of discourse hold unprecedented opportunities for visual poets exploring the outer reaches of language and image. Many asemic writers are conducting similar experiments with musical scores and notations. 

I venture tentatively to suggest the cutting-edge of asemics today belongs to this – still early – experimentation with non-rational (irrational) systems. (The Leftwich & Gaze notion of asemic writing is one of the more complex linguistic-philosophical koans of the century!). 

My own involvement with asemic theory that I have – half jokingly – named “Asemiotics” requires new thought outside existing paradigms. (We struggle with imprecise terms and things that do not yet have names.) Given a resurgence of interest, I would suggest asemic writers become fellow travelers with Pataphysicians. Pataphysics can provide a synthesis of the humanities, sciences, and math required for this depth of inquiry.

 

 

From Deconstructions by Jim Leftwich (2006)
(Image courtesy of the Asemic Front Archive)

 

3)  I believe Frederico Federici’s main bone of contention in his multi-faceted essay is a concern over the designification of scientific, mathematical, and other systems into a Kitsch (faux) vispo that is churning through global currents of both pixilated ether and print journals. 

Stepping away from physics for a moment, I believe Jean Baudrillard’s (not optimistic) notions of commodification, collapse of the sign, and now the death-spiral of the Simulacra itself are visionary.

In hyper-reality we are bombarded and engulfed in the self-referential process of commodification, consumption, and control. Forms are replicating and mutating. We are experiencing the hyper-real over-production of images. As Australian visual poet Kristen Szumyn has explained to me, "The Meta-Modern is alive and well and shattering into an infinity of particles." How does a new form of discourse – asemic writing – factor into this revolution?

I generally agree with Federici that asemic writing is a well and the power is in its depths; however, Kitsch might not be the best descriptor of the aesthetic. I have had conversations about Kitsch with European friends, and the designation seems negative. 

In the USA, we have “Popular Culture,” which seems more egalitarian than Kitsch, somehow, should you have those ideo-cultural concerns. Inevitably, a faux "asemic art" has taken root; I am in complete agreement with Federici. For me, an asemic work is defined by its textuality, which deflates the "art" aspect.

I ask Frederico Federici to take into consideration the current interest among visual poets in Guy DeBord’s The Society of Spectacle (1967) (and its offshoots), the Situationists, the Lettrists, and others who challenged the system by reflecting back through, a sometimes distorted, mirror that expressed protest. Andy Warhol’s popart embodies this aesthetic. This particular approach has produced innovative results in vispo via the application of glitchart (or as I call it GlitchText).

My criticisms of “Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch: Scientific Forms and Structural Depth” by Federico Federici are few and minor. I think the piece is remarkable because it addresses so many issues receiving attention in the vispo and asemic writing communities now. This essay offers clear insights and elucidations to anyone seriously exploring asemic writing.


- De Villo Sloan

July 24, 2025

Elbridge, New York, USA 


Response by Federico Federici to De Villo Sloan's Commentary on "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" July 26, 2025 


Below is a response from Federico Federici to questions and insights from readers about his "Misreading Asemic Writing..." article including Australian visual poet Kristen Szumyn, Terry Reid, Daniel E. Stetson (and myself) along with others. We have had a lively and wonderful discussion. Here are the words of Federici: 

"First of all, I thank those who read my piece attentively. I respond here, briefly and in the form of notes, to some of the valid observations that have been raised.

"To state that 'the symbolic thought underlying scientific notation differs radically from, and is irreconcilable with, any aesthetic-emotional perspective' does not mean stripping the resulting insight of philosophical—nor, as scientists like Einstein or Feynman teach us—of aesthetic value. 

"What I mean by this statement is that the symbolic manipulation that produces the forms and formulas of scientific notation does not presuppose any aesthetic or emotional foundation in itself: there are precise rules, and these may be dictated by the need for adherence to the universe or by the mere internal consistency of a formal system that does not require any further interpretation. Nor is there any democratic or moral rule, for that matter. Often in physics one hears that certain forms are 'beautiful because they are simple,' but the point is that this is a consequence—they were not constructed with that goal in mind, nor manipulated for it. Their simplicity, moreover, almost always presupposes extreme complexity in interpretation.

"To state that mass and energy are equivalent and that the proportionality constant is the square of c raises interpretative questions that cannot be resolved through aesthetic-emotional reasoning. Of course, one may say, 'What a magnificent product of the human mind! Such a simple formula at the foundation of the universe!' But then what? The entire relational system of the universe is called into question: the concept of space, of time, of the combined metric of the two dimensions. Nothing simple—far from it. In fact, Minkowski’s metric was already known in mathematics before it was discovered that it could describe Einsteinian spacetime—further proof that, symbolically, content is not required.

"Popular science books, which constantly deal with paradoxes that are not paradoxes at all (see, for instance, the twin paradox), demonstrate how the mediation between natural language and scientific notation is not immediate. At times, it is 'irreducible' as in the case of the words 'wave' and 'particle' between classical and modern models. Addressing these issues formally is not within everyone’s reach, and even for those who can do the math, there remains the problem of 'translating' the meaning of those equations into a conventional language that was not forged with those ideas in mind. Consider the concept of time, the tripartition of past, present, and future—all things wiped away (in common sense terms) by Einstein, as Joyce’s work exemplifies in the artistic field.

"When, for example, I insist on the absence of content that does not preclude the existence of the work, I am reiterating the same concept in another form. I do not need to know what a mathematical object represents in order to represent or manipulate it. Whether one likes it or not, this is a fact: that a + a = 2a is independent of whether we’re counting deaths in war or apples on a tree. So: are we grieving for the slaughter or rejoicing for the harvest? This point is—in my view—fundamental for placing emphasis on the metric-relational discourse that seems to me to be at the heart of an asemic page’s raison d’être.

"In science, it is a constant interplay between practice and theory (so, to put it simply: between content and its symbolic form): the point is that the content of an experiment cannot be modified or steered by the experimenter’s emotional expectations, nor by their need for beauty or simplicity.

"The recent developments in artificial intelligence—which, contrary to what is sometimes said, is not just a stochastic parrot—demonstrate precisely how at times 'it is not necessary to know what one is saying in order to say it well' (which, in itself, may seem absurd, but if one considers the previous example, one can count in the abstract and the result holds). Machines do not know what they are saying, and yet they manipulate texts and information in extremely plausible ways, and they are machines built to simulate the human brain. Clearly, this does not, as of today, reduce humans to machines (or vice versa), but it does bring machines closer to humans—and as the complexity of not only the algorithms but also the hardware on which they run increases, I believe we may one day reach a point where human and machine truly touch.

"This morning, unaware of these comments, I was listening to a piece by Archie Shepp and thinking about how magnificent the coherence of all the notes was, even if they were barely distinguishable from one another, nor could one assign a 'content' to them. For this reason, all explorations that bring music together with the asemic world seem to me full of potential for new perspectives and ideas.

"My critique—maybe a direct one—is not aimed at the use of kitsch in itself—far from it! What I wanted to clarify is that the association between scientific notation and kitsch is by no means automatic and, in fact, that there are few footholds for transforming one into the other, unless one is willing to reduce the discourse to extreme simplifications. Joyce’s letters and notes during the drafting of his most complex works are proof of how intricate (and necessary) it is to gain full awareness of certain concepts in order to transpose them into the artistic domain."


Depeest thanks to both Federico Federici and the readers, from around the globe and from different disciplines and cultures, who shared the work and ideas so closely.


De Villo Sloan is a concrete poet living in Upstate New York. He writes frequently about postavant culture and is the director of the Winifred & De Villo Sloan, Jr. Charitable Fund.