Asemic Front 2
Friday, August 8, 2025
AF2 Gallery: "The Seagull's Alphabet" & Other Recent Eco-Asemics & Object Poems by Geof Huth (New York City)
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Machine L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E: Danny Snelson "Reconstitutes" Charles Bernstein's Classic Avant Texts
Danny Snelson is involved in a project, L≠A≠N≠G≠U≠A≠G≠E, using artificial intelligence to "reconstitute" the original magazine published by the Language poets (1978-82) "so that machines might appreciate this 'poetics'". Visit the project here:
https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/the-little-database/resource/snelson-9781452973456-r006
Deepest thanks to Christian Bok who originally shared this information at X.
Tuesday, August 5, 2025
Dispatches from the Metasemic Hyperreal: New Work by EgiDia Elle (Italy), Miekal And (USA), Mike Miskowski (USA), Kristen Szumyn (Australia)
Violet storms wail electric dirge across fields
Shattered echoes drift beneath silent moon’s gaze
Fractured hearts pulse incandescent through ashen air
Ghost-winds murmur lost lullabies on the wind
Time’s shards float down ruins of ancient spires
Night’s ember-rain kindles whispers of tomorrow
Dawn carves its cry across a weary sky
Square 2
Deep oceans tremble under impossible ice
Salt-veins shiver where no sunlight ever falls
Submerged runes uncoil in drowned cathedral halls
Currents carry songs of drowned constellations
Coral-veils sway to a phantom’s lullaby
Breathless pearls drift toward the crushing dark
Pressure blooms crystal roses in the deep
Square 3
Scarlet rivers flow backward through ragged bones
Blood-tide blossoms in the marrow of time
Veins of flame map a geography of grief
Heart-cinders flicker on the brink of void
Each pulse erupts with the roar of stars
Ash and ember intertwine in silent dance
All endings blossom into new beginnings
Square 4
Wind-carved mountains hum with ancient memory
Stone-voices echo in the hollow of days
Broken peaks cradle vaults of buried stars
Sun-dust settles on the crest of legends
Roots of granite twist toward hidden worth
Sky-fissures bleed light into timeless dark
Pilgrims of dust kneel before stone-gods
Square 5
Neon flowers bloom on metal-waste horizons
Circuit-vines pulse with the hum of ghosts
Synthetic petals slow-dance in acid rain
Iron-breezes carry the scent of ozone
Rust-spores drift among electric gardens
Digital moths flicker in the cobalt night
Memory-seeds sprout in coded cathedrals
Square 6
Clock-ciphers spin within the mind’s deep vault
Ticking shadows stretch across thought’s expanse
Pendulums chant in the language of hours
Seconds fracture into galaxies of cost
Silent gears grind out stories of regret
Time-ghosts wander halls of vanished chance
Tomorrow stands at the threshold of now
Square 7
Ember-wings glimmer atop collapsed spires
Phoenix-ashes drift through the ashen air
Renewal’s heartbeat stirs beneath cold dust
Flame-seeds sleep in the cavern of stone
Hope’s spark waits in the hollow of night
Dawn’s breath coaxes new life from ruin
Every death carries the seed of dawn
Square 8
Celestial gardens bloom on cratered plains
Starlight-dew drips from the bones of comets
Moon-vines curl around forgotten temples
Meteor-petals scatter over endless night
Galactic winds hum hymns of creation
Universe-roots delve through the womb of dark
Life awakens in the hush between stars
Friday, August 1, 2025
Vispo by Thomas Cassidy Including Collabs with Sheila E. Murphy & John M. Bennett (USA)
Sunday, July 27, 2025
Asemic Front 2 Gallery: "Man from Cyclades" & Other New Asemic Writing by Tatiana Roumelioti (Athens, Greece)
Thursday, July 24, 2025
Asemic Front 2 Commentary: A Response to Federico Federici's "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" by De Villo Sloan
Frederico Federici is a postmodern Renaissance person. He earned a degree in physics from the University of Genoa (Italy) and is a practicing scientist. He is also a prolific and acclaimed visual poet who publishes and performs worldwide. Federici offers us valuable insights of importance to the community. Here are some of my thoughts about the article:
1) “Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch” primarily discusses the presence (or lack thereof) of structures in asemic writing/composition. I am a believer in asemic forms, especially as they are proposed by Federici. The late, brilliant Belgian poet Guido Vermeulen argued with me publicly saying, 'Form in asemic texts is theoretically impossible.' I wish my dear friend Guido were here to read Federici’s essay and consider its subtle nuances. Federici untangles the threads.
This passage from "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" explains the primary binary opposition in his main premise (although Federici transcends the binary in his discourse):
"Science, sharpened by methodological uncertainty, resists any closure: its pursuit of simplicity is not an aesthetic concession but the hard-won outcome of falsification and reduction. Kitsch, by contrast, operates through immediacy, relying on recognizable signs emptied of critical function and shaped by cultural clichés or personal resonance. It is thus evident that the symbolic thought underlying scientific notation differs radically from, and is irreconcilable with, any aesthetic-emotional perspective.
"Labelling asemic-scientific works as kitsch assumes that their scientific forms are deployed merely for their technical appeal. Yet, absent rigorous evidence, one could argue that the hybridization of asemic writing and scientific language operates on a cutting-edge plane, shaped by natively void signifiers and formal systems rather than semantic content. Hence, the asemanticisation process does not apply to the signifiers themselves but reveals the structures that bind and articulate them. This approach parallels symbolic computation, where signifiers function relationally without intrinsic content." (Federico Federici Weisses Werk)
2) My own forays into using scientific and mathematical signification systems in my own work are largely intuitive and often use found material. But my instincts – as Federici’s reasoning affirms – tell me these modes of discourse hold unprecedented opportunities for visual poets exploring the outer reaches of language and image. Many asemic writers are conducting similar experiments with musical scores and notations.
I venture tentatively to suggest the cutting-edge of asemics today belongs to this – still early – experimentation with non-rational (irrational) systems. (The Leftwich & Gaze notion of asemic writing is one of the more complex linguistic-philosophical koans of the century!).
My own involvement with asemic theory that I have – half jokingly – named “Asemiotics” requires new thought outside existing paradigms. (We struggle with imprecise terms and things that do not yet have names.) Given a resurgence of interest, I would suggest asemic writers become fellow travelers with Pataphysicians. Pataphysics can provide a synthesis of the humanities, sciences, and math required for this depth of inquiry.
(Image courtesy of the Asemic Front Archive)
3) I believe Frederico Federici’s main bone of contention in his multi-faceted essay is a concern over the designification of scientific, mathematical, and other systems into a Kitsch (faux) vispo that is churning through global currents of both pixilated ether and print journals.
Stepping away from physics for a moment, I believe Jean Baudrillard’s (not optimistic) notions of commodification, collapse of the sign, and now the death-spiral of the Simulacra itself are visionary.
In hyper-reality we are bombarded and engulfed in the self-referential process of commodification, consumption, and control. Forms are replicating and mutating. We are experiencing the hyper-real over-production of images. As Australian visual poet Kristen Szumyn has explained to me, "The Meta-Modern is alive and well and shattering into an infinity of particles." How does a new form of discourse – asemic writing – factor into this revolution?
I generally agree with Federici that asemic writing is a well and the power is in its depths; however, Kitsch might not be the best descriptor of the aesthetic. I have had conversations about Kitsch with European friends, and the designation seems negative.
In the USA, we have “Popular Culture,” which seems more egalitarian than Kitsch, somehow, should you have those ideo-cultural concerns. Inevitably, a faux "asemic art" has taken root; I am in complete agreement with Federici. For me, an asemic work is defined by its textuality, which deflates the "art" aspect.
I ask Frederico Federici to take into consideration the current interest among visual poets in Guy DeBord’s The Society of Spectacle (1967) (and its offshoots), the Situationists, the Lettrists, and others who challenged the system by reflecting back through, a sometimes distorted, mirror that expressed protest. Andy Warhol’s popart embodies this aesthetic. This particular approach has produced innovative results in vispo via the application of glitchart (or as I call it GlitchText).
My criticisms of “Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch: Scientific Forms and Structural Depth” by Federico Federici are few and minor. I think the piece is remarkable because it addresses so many issues receiving attention in the vispo and asemic writing communities now. This essay offers clear insights and elucidations to anyone seriously exploring asemic writing.
- De Villo Sloan
July 24, 2025
Elbridge, New York, USA
Response by Federico Federici to De Villo Sloan's Commentary on "Misreading Asemic Writing as Kitsch" July 26, 2025