Sunday, January 2, 2022

"A Case of Severe Incoherence, Auto-Complaint & DaDaistic Uhr Laub Poems" - An Af2 Interview with Adriana Kobor

 


Asemic Front 2 Correspondent-at-Large Adriana Kobor


A Case of Severe Incoherence, Auto-Complaint & DaDaistic Uhr Laub Poems


An Interview with Adriana Kobor


Asemic Front 2: Welcome back, Adriana. It has been several months since your last appearance here at AF2. Please tell us what you have been doing, especially in your capacity as Correspondent-at-Large for Asemic Front.


Adriana Kobor: I am living in a shitty hotel in Italy, better than nothing, but I am free to change anywhere to anyone, and anyone to anywhere. To further observe the question, the forms you had sketched here had invited me to mourn the womb to which I never can return (I never will so I would never want to) a.k.a. some Freudian insinuation which might not even be there.

No jokes over here, it is all dead serious, so when we can grasp that we can either (1) die (2) start dying (3) dream about the completion of anything else. I had fun writing this, but I know much worse, you always must know that. (That is clear in whatever I do.)


_______________________________

“I am living in a shitty hotel in Italy, better than nothing, but I am free to change…. To further observe the question, the forms you had sketched here had invited me to mourn the womb to which I never can return….” 

                                                                                                  - Adriana Kobor

________________________________


Asemic Front 2: What have you been doing in terms of your own creativity?

Adriana Kobor: I was working on a philosophically and sociologically mesmerizing project with Dirk Vekemans [Belgium], yet unpublished. That took up all my energy in the most severe case of incoherence, auto-complaint, dadaistic Uhr-laub poems, fonts to be played with... A completely uncensored piece of opinions put into a betonmixer of 0 ideology, 0 future and mental masturbations. The context is always partially shared, partially prohibited, a sort of bouncing between here and there in an online RT-space.





Vispo collaboration by Adriana Kobor & Dirk Vekemans


____________________________________

"[The Dirk Vekemans collaborations] took up all my energy in a case of severe incoherence, auto-complaint, dadaistic Uhr-laub poems, fonts to be played with.... A completely uncensored piece of opinions put into a betonmixer of 0 ideology, 0 future and mental masturbations."

                                                                                                     - Adriana Kobor

________________________________





Asemic Front 2:  Can you tell us about your visual projects?


Adriana Kabor: There has been nothing done: no collage work, no paintings and only a few digital works - or at least nothing that is not in the publishing process.

I am mostly thinking about the REVEALEATORY nature of this last, vast body of work I have been doing with Dirk, because, once again, it needs to get some editing and the right context in order to find its right place in the universe.

Twenty twenty-one brought some self-made collections I consider quite interesting (not that far from what you call asemic) and typographic pieces, of which one had been sent to Australia in its entirety for the I.M. project of Richard Kostelanetz. Here you can see:

https://adrianakobor.wixsite.com/poet?fbclid=IwAR0HPG8JzHq-xI1uSk9hKh3wc0UCMKHD5rrCXUe4FVu6-izpPbB5Xri1ZiQ




Asemic Front 2:
 You have been a correspondent for Af2 during a remarkable moment in history that has been accompanied by an outpouring of visual poetry. Given your current philosophical meditations, can you describe your situation as an artist, writer & a woman for the present readers and for readers in the future seeking to understand this complex time?

Adriana Kobor: The world is hard on me, on many of us, I know, it should have been just a play all along, but it is not. And I am not quite ready to grow up, and for that I am blamed, like "all writers are just useless creatures." The problem is: One's destiny cannot be avoided, not by any chance and not by any slyness. 


_____________________

"The world is hard on me, on many of us, I know, it should have been just a play all along, but it is not. And I am not quite ready to grow up, and for that I am blamed, like 'all writers are just useless creatures.'"

                                                                                                 - Adriana Kobor

_____________________


To be able to contemplate this, which means: To be able to write about it, too, means that one has lived, loved and suffered. But to grasp it in its entirety and live with the given knowledge, is the hardest part of all. So anyone who knows this, wishes to have never needed to live, love, suffer. They remain in that unconscious state to which we all long to return. 

I do not know whether there is such a return. So in the U-turns we produce something by which we try to prove that nothing ends, but especially: We do not. The real true end developer, though, lets us know that such an excuse is too weak compared to what nature needs to limit, destroy, complete, and kill.

So the trueness of all words remains in this world, trying to communicate and reach another. And that very far end, that world, has become the only thing that still has real meaning inside it, for me to "feel, understand and develop." 

As if you touch an old camera: It has its limitations and its possibilities; it is just a casual means by which you freeze the moment. To prolong that frozen moment, that which is there, where you, at the end of this digital world read me, either you want to or you will not. 

The only choice left is negation, though that does not quell the thirst for the real, the true, the one, in other words: the good and the beautiful, we have all lost in different ways and different measures. So how you can feel this innocence corresponds with how you can cheat it. 

A trick-or-treat that has several results in a binary continuum. To have it or not to have it. A part is given by nature; it is a gift. The other part needs to be gained for that gift to develop. I wonder why it is so hard to get that second part moving, and yet I wonder why it is so hard to grasp - what is there to be grasped but felt? I have a problem with intellectualizing the problem. 


-sSs-






 

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Unpacking "decompositions" by Jim Leftwich (Part 2)


 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 



 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 



 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 




"decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 





 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 





 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 





 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 




 "decompositions" (2006) by Jim Leftwich 













"Asemic Diagram for 12.21.21" by Alicia Starr Ryan

 



"Asemic Diagram for 12.21.21" by Alicia Starr Ryan 

(Maplewood, New Jersey, USA)



-sSs-


Editor's Note: Alicia Starr Ryan is an Asemic Front 2 contributor. She has been a participant in Cheryl Penn's international collaborative book projects, among other associations.

- DVS




Monday, December 20, 2021

Asemic Conceptualism or Asemiotics ? "poema" by Roberto Ncar + Jack Foley & Ncar Vispo Homage

 


"poema" by Roberto Ncar (San Juan, Puerto Rico)






"poema" by Roberto Ncar 





"poema" by Roberto Ncar 


-sSs-




Vispo asemic homage to Roberto Ncar & Jack Foley by De Villo Sloan





Vispo asemic homage to Roberto Ncar & Jack Foley by De Villo Sloan





Vispo asemic homage to Roberto Ncar & Jack Foley by De Villo Sloan





Vispo asemic homage to Roberto Ncar & Jack Foley by De Villo Sloan










Sunday, December 19, 2021

Searching for the Primal Asemic: New Work by Lucinda Sherlock

 


By Lucinda Sherlock (Perth, Australia) (December 18, 2021)




By Lucinda Sherlock (Perth, Australia) 







Lucinda Sherlock is a past AF2 contributor and celebrated figure in the Australian visual poetry world. 






/*Poem*/ : New Asemic Visual Poetry by Dona Mayoora


/*Poem*/ by Dona Mayoora (December 18, 2021)




Dona Mayoora


Editor's Note: Dona Mayoora is an AF2 contributor - perpetually popular with readers - who has been an influential voice in the Asemic Front Project through its various phases. 

I believe this piece relates especially to discussions of asemic and pansemic (anti-) symbols and structures that have occupied the blog recently.

Deepest thanks to Dona Mayoora for sharing this work. We certainly look forward to seeing her work in the future.

- De Villo Sloan




Friday, December 17, 2021

AF2 Lost Classic: Asemic/Pansemic by Todd Burst - An Essay



Asemic writing - visual poetry by Nancy Bell Scott (AF2 Archives)


Asemic/Pansemic?

By Todd Burst

First published July 14, 2018:

https://jburst88j.medium.com/asemic-pansemic-bff57a0dcfc4

Asemic writing is a wordless open semantic form of writing.[1][2][3] The word asemic means “having no specific semantic content,” or “without the smallest unit of meaning.”[4] (from Wikipedia)

In 2015 (Scriptjr.nl), artist Jim Leftwich argued that “there’s no actually perfect ‘asemic’ thing or sign, since everything conveys some meaning, everything may find its way to - at - least an inner ‘emotional’ (scribble of) meaning.”

So, instead of using the term asemic to denote a - rather new - art form, Leftwich proposes that we use “pansemic.” Pansemic means, “that everything emits/ expresses some semantically rich sign, always provided with almost a shadow of meaning; so everything makes sense and a bunch of meaningful directions may always be attached to the invisible arrows uprising from any of the written traces we imagine and conceive and make or find.”


Asemic visual poetry by Kerri Pullo (AF2 Archives)

Unfortunately, I disagree with this. Although I respect and very much enjoy Leftwich’s work, I think his concept of asemic/ pansemic might need more reflection. But before I begin my tirade, I want to make it known that I am a philosopher and a follower of Ludwig Wittgenstein: That is to say, I believe meaning is contextual, social and part of our everyday normal routines of doing things, i.e. language is a behavior, etc.

The problem I have with Leftwich’s comment - “that everything emits/ expresses some semantically rich sign” - borrows from structuralism/ postructuralism and Wittgenstein. The meaning of a word (for a structuralist and/or postructuralist) emerges through its difference with other words.

To say that everything is meaningful negates non-meaningful, which in turn negates meaningful since we can’t determine the difference between a meaningful and non-meaningful “semantically rich sign.” So, to say everything has meaning is to say nothing has meaning, but this does not get us back to asemic writing.

Secondly, meaning - in semantics, language, etc. - is socially understood… socially communicable. So a pansemic work would have to elicit a linguistic response - not a feeling - that we would all understand or could be made to understand via language.

________________________________________________

"Abstract art and asemic writing can convey a feeling or an aesthetic quality that remains unnamable, but that does not mean that it is endowed with meaning. A sensation and meaning are two different things. This does not mean that we will not find a common way of speaking about a common aesthetic it-ness that a certain asemic work elicits. This could happen, but it has not."  - Todd Burst

_________________

Abstract art and asemic writing can convey a feeling or an aesthetic quality that remains unnamable, but that does not mean that it is endowed with meaning. A sensation and meaning are two different things. This does not mean that we will not find a common way of speaking about a common aesthetic it-ness that a certain asemic work elicits. This could happen, but it has not.

I agree with most of Marco Giovenale's response to Leftwich:

"A 'proper' [sic] asemic area can be seen in the zone of the mind opaquely linking our expectations for a known written linguistic message and content to an actually unknown shape of glyph.... a whole text or drawing appears in front of us an asemic 'thing,' indecipherable to the intellect that does not recognize the language; but at the same time it may be meaningful to the taste... perception,,, soliciting empathy... sensations.... or something similar."

I generally agree with Giovenale's writing. In the Present case, I believe he explains how any glyph, symbol, etc. could represent this "sensation[s],"but we do not have "access" to this particular symbol.

I disagree with the definition and application of "pansemic" for reasons stated above. I think "asemic work" is much more suitable for the art both Leftwich and Giovenale create, because it makes a tension between what can be expressed and what cannot.

Meaningless writing is beautiful because it does not weigh us down with tangibility, Asemic writing should stay true to its asemia (?!?) its (non-sense).

                                                                                -sSs-


Asemic visual poetry by Todd Burst (2021)

Editor's Note: Todd Burst aka Toddy Bee lives in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, and studied at the University of New Orleans. He is an Asemic Front 2 contributor.